Thursday, May 14, 2009

Shocking New HIV Transmission News

According to two recent studies, one out of the US and one in the Amsterdam, it seems that a majority (or a close plurality) of men who have sex with men (MSM) are contracting HIV from... their main sexual partner. Unlike the stereotype where MSM's (read: "gay" and "bisexual," but we're talking behavior here not identity politics) contract HIV from random partners met in bars, clubs, parties, or on the internet, it seems that monogamy is one of the driving forces behind HIV infection.

From the US paper:
Results: Sixty-eight percent [95% confidence interval (CI) 58–78) of HIV transmissions were from main sex partners because of a higher number of sex acts with main partners, more frequent receptive roles in anal sex with main partners, and lower condom use during anal sex with main partners. By sex type, 69% (95% CI 59–79) of infections were from receptive anal intercourse, 28% (95% CI 19–38) were from insertive anal intercourse, and 2% (95% CI 0–5) were from oral sex. The model-based estimated HIV incidence rate was 2.2% (95% CI 1.7–2.7) per year. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated estimates of transmission from main sex partners as low as 52% (95% CI 41–62) and as high as 74% (95% CI 68–80).

Conclusion: According to our model, most HIV transmissions among MSM in five US cities are from main sex partners. HIV prevention efforts should take into account the risks of HIV transmissions in male partnerships, and couples-based HIV prevention interventions for MSM should be given high priority in the US HIV prevention research portfolio.
Though this will probably shock a lot of people, I think a lot of people who work in the field will not be surprised for the data.

Looking back at the people I have tested positive in my 5 years of HIV-testing, I have to say that the vast majority (probably 70% or more) had fewer than five sex partners in a year, with a mean around 2 or 3. I think there is a certain comfort level when you state that you are "monogamously oriented." Let's run down the thinking:

Person A meets Person B. Both have a series of long-term (defined as 6 months or longer) relationships in their history, possibly a handful of shorter relationships, and very few very short term (one night to one week) relationships. In total, we have two people whose lifetime number of sexual partners is less than 10, maybe 20 at the very outset. Compared to the stereotype of gay men, that is extremely low. If you add in the fact that perhaps one or both do not actively access the gay community and may not identify as "gay," you're talking about a smaller number and a decreased perception of risk.

So Person A and Person B enter into a relationship. Perhaps one (or both) have been recently tested, within the last 3 months, say. A few months in, they both feel comfortable with each other and they decide that because they perceive each other (and themselves) to be low risk that it would be OK to stop using a condom... or, perhaps, they were drunk or especially hot one night and just stopped.

But, let's say Person B became infected 3 months before the relationship began, or even as far as 9 months before the relationship began (HIV takes 3-6 months to show up on standard HIV-screening tests), perhaps with the last long-term relationship, or perhaps in a mistake one night with one of the other partners. But, because he was tested, he does not believe that he is still seroconverting and still an "invisible" positive. Person B becomes the insertive partner in intercourse, thus infecting Person A.

In no part of that scenario was a truly awful decision made; rather, I think it is an easy series of decisions to make in the context of a monogamous relationship. And, now, we have two HIV+ individuals who are unaware of their status. Then, they don't get tested because they are together. They break up a few months later, Person B, perhaps a year or more later, thinks about getting tested... and finds he is HIV+. He contacts Person A who got tested immediately after the relationship ended and found that he was as yet undetectable, and now Person A is in another relationship with Person C where a condom is not being used. Person A, maybe, is still within that 6 month window, tests again, receives a non-reactive/negative result (though he is actually infected) and the cycle goes on.

What's the proper course of action? Monogamy with a condom for six months or more, get tested together, and then have the condom discussion. Contact STOP AIDS (513-421-2437) to get your test done. It's only 20 minutes, and there's no blood.

It's worth your time.


apostleshadamishe said...


is being proven by the more than 400 individuals who have taken a dose of 60 ml three times daily for 21 days. The result is that AMBUSH 'KILLS' the virus by causing the protein envelope to rupture and the viral particles are discarded by the white blood cells. AMBUSH is able to 'KILL' the virus that are 'hiding' in the lymph system by its 'natural radioactive' properties. This process allows the body to 'return to normal health' with a corresponding immunity to that or those strains of the virus.

What is AMBUSH ?
AMBUSH is a radioactive isotope of uranium that is found in the 'palm' plant of which there are more than 3000 species. When ingested, AMBUSH causes the body temperature in the trunk area to rise to about 102 degrees when the individual is sleeping. The preparation takes four hours per batch, which is then given to the individuals for consumption 60 ml three times daily for 21 days. AMBUSH is a herbal preparation in this form but it contains an active ingredient which is a 'NEW' crystalline substance, a drug from the 'palm plant' similarly to ASPIRIN originating from the willow tree bark

After 21 days on AMBUSH, ALL the individuals experienced a decrease in viral load to undetectable, an increase in cd4, increase in RBC, an improvement in general health such as more color to the face, decrease in Buffalo hump, an increase in gluteal muscles, a decrease to having no joint pains whereby individuals can bend to touch their toes, and walk up steps are but a few examples. There is also a dramatic increase in their sexual appetite beginning after the first week of therapy

In any plant concoction such as percolated 'tea', there are 30-40,000 compounds, whi ch would take the scientific community twenty years to isolate one particular ingredient if they knew what they were looking for. The LORD GOD has given me seven steps to isolate the active ingredient, which is soft and metallic in nature and has a carbon- uranium-sulfur-(classified)-phentolamine configuration or structure. This is similar to Federick Kekule and the discovery of the benzene ring where he dreamt the structure.

As an antiviral and 'natural radioactivity' producing agent, AMBUSH is also effective against leukemia, lupus and HPV. Here I am saying that I have 'GIVEN' AMBUSH in the same 'strength' and dosage to patients with leukemia, lupus and HPV. A 35 year old male with HIV found it difficult to impossible to urinate was put on 'green tea' and water while the doctors contemplated prostrate surgery. One of the doctors gave him my number , I sent him a supply of AMBUSH an d he has not been given any more ARV's, since taking AMBUSH 18 months ago, is in 'good' health and has expressed a willingness to be examined by HIV investigators like many others who have taken AMBUSH.

I have sent this 'IDEA' to most HIV research agencies, scientist of the field, universities, hospitals, clinics, politicians and news agencies to which it is REJECTED because the name of THE LORD GOD is mentioned. He has steered me scientifically through the processes such as which plant and how to produce the active ingredient. What are the odds of a Florida Pharmacist picking a plant would contain the CURE for HIV/AIDS ?
I have never charged any of the people for their supply of AMBUSH but a life saving has been spent on the project with NO renumeration from any sources because AMBUSH falls outside the walls of modern medicine and research.


My proposal is that I PROVE that AMBUSH CURES HIV/AIDS by giving it to a number of END-STAGE or DRUG-RESISTANT people and the scientific community watches their recovery. This proposal addresses the problem in that I have already outlaid the results to be obtained.

This IDEA is unconventional in that the scientific community has rejected AMBUSH because I say it is GOD given. Secondly if I wrote it according to certain standards, then it might be peer reviewed. However, THE LORD GOD has also shown me that there are five enzyme systems associated with the virus, reverse transcriptase, protease, fusion and two more of which causes the virus to be AIRBOURNE. This means that without DIVINE intervention mankind and ALL warm- blooded mammals will be extinct in a number of years.

The PROOF of what I am saying is found in scientific papers wherein it is found that when the protease cuts the viral strands, it cuts it at DIFFERENT lengths EVERY time, to which it should always be a valine at the end but is a different amino acid every time. This is why it is IMPOSSIBLE to produce a VACCINE.

Since this is NOT a hypothesis but there are about 400 individuals who have taken AMBUSH, here lies a vast area in which to check, recheck and confirm that AMBUSH CURES AIDS. Let it be mentioned that during the HIV reproductive cycle, reverse transcriptase converts viral RNA into DNA compatible to human genetic materials. Thus the human DNA has been 'hijacked' and since each person has a DIFFERENT DNA, then the new viral copy is unique to that person which shows that each individual has a DIFFERENT STRAIN of the virus. Consider two HIV positive people swapping viral strains and increasing its complexity with multiple partners.
It can also be proposed that they be revisited as proof that the strain or strains that they had were 'killed' at the time of taking AMBUSH considering that a person can catch as many different strains as there are people who are infected by HIV.
I am also willing to work with the scientific community in identifying those individuals who took AMBUSH and wish to be identified with this process notwithstanding that some are stigmatized while others are jubilant,

Once AMBUSH is verified as being able to accomplish that which is aforementioned then the next stage might be the natural and artificial synthesis of the substance.

Finally, if this is accepted or not, believed or not, THE LORD GOD always wins and this is the heavenly truth to which AMBUSH was divinely given to mankind for the CURE of HIV/AIDS and it will be here forever. Apostle Shada Mishe.

Here is a video taped presentation that I gave at t he Martin Luther King library in Washington

Anonymous said...

1. I chafe at your use of "proper" at the end. 6 months monogamy w/ condom use may be the most SAFE (other then abstinence, or giving up anal sex), but whose to really say what is proper.

Don't stigmatize sexually transmitted infections or sexual lifestyle choices.

It's a small distinction, but the implications are deep.

2. the first comment is bat-shit crazy.